Home > Society > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity > Perspectives > Origins and Creation > Intelligent Design > Opposing Views
http://ncse.com/creationism/general/intelligent-design-not-accepted-by-most-scientists
A critique by the National Center for Science Education.
http://talkdesign.org/cs/
An archive of materials that critically examine the scientific claims of the ID movement.
http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesignwatch/
The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry presents articles, books, news items and links related to intelligent design.
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/design_yes_intelligent_no_a_critique_of_intelligent_design_theory_and_neocr/
Critique of Intelligent Design Theory and Neocreationism. Skeptical Inquirer.
http://www.infidels.org/secular_web/feature/1999/wedge.html
Critique of the Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture's (CRSC) widely-circulated position paper on intelligent design.
http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/htmlsite/darwinanddesign.html
A Natural History Magazine article with position statements of proponents of ID and responses by opponents.
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/neither_intelligent_nor_designed/
An article with the premise that Intelligent Design fails to meet even the most fundamental elements of rational inquiry.
http://www.kcfs.org/CFS/CFSKrebs.pdf
A site that argues that ID seeks to elevate one theological position that God intervenes in evolution in empirically detectable ways, over other theological positions and uses it as a wedge issue.
http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesignwatch/not-science.html
A research scientist presents arguments against ID and suggests reasons why it should not be taught in the classroom.
Home > Society > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity > Perspectives > Origins and Creation > Intelligent Design > Opposing Views
Thanks to DMOZ, which built a great web directory for nearly two decades and freely shared it with the web. About us