Home > Society > Issues > Health > Tobacco > Advocacy > Pro-Tobacco > Critiques > Secondhand Smoke
http://www.charitywire.com/charity6/03359.html
Expose of study funded by the tobacco industry.
http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/11/4/315.full
Paper describes the history and role of the tobacco industry in the development of ventilation standards for indoor air quality by influencing the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE).
http://www.gaspforair.org/gasp/gedc/artcl-new.php?ID=75
From GASP of Colorado Education Center, summary of evidence that the tobacco industry was funding and organizing opposition to a Boulder smoke free ordinance.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=FOREST
Article on the pro-smoking group FOREST reveals that 96% of its funding comes from the tobacco industry.
http://www.bmj.com/content/325/7377/1413
Journal article documents how the tobacco industry generated a study and hid its involvement in an attempt to fight the emerging science on secondhand smoke.
http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/about/org/bsc/rocsub/docs/1998/index.html
National scientific organization concludes unanimously that secondhand smoke is a known human carcinogen; the tobacco industry sends 10 witnesses to argue the other way.
http://www.nisus.se/archive/020610e.html
Article about Swedish professor R. Rylander, accused of having secretely worked for the tobacco industry, sheds light on tobacco industry funding of research intended to create doubt about health effects.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/tobacco/stories/second.htm
Washington Post article: "Tobacco giant Philip Morris systematically wooed scientists who might help the company counter the growing consensus on the health risks of secondhand tobacco smoke and 'keep the controversy alive,' according to a 1988 internal tobacco company document."
http://www.cnn.com/US/9708/13/smoky.skies/
CEO of tobacco giant R. J. Reynolds testifies that smoking isn't addictive and secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer.
http://www.tobacco.org/Documents/osha/oshapost.html
Post-OSHA Hearings Comments, 1996. Extensive analysis of tobacco industry arguments; sections on credibility and causality, publication bias, confounding variables, and misclassification error.
http://www.gaspforair.org/gasp/gedc/artcl-new.php?ID=94
Short history from GASP of Colorado Education Center.
http://apha.confex.com/apha/130am/techprogram/paper_45347.htm
Paper discusses how and why the tobacco industry influences the setting of standards for indoor air quality.
http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/11/2/94.full
Research paper reviews internal industry documents, finds the tobacco industry created a myth of lost profits to fight smokefree public places.
http://www.no-smoke.org/htmlpage.php?id=63
Report outlines tactics used by the industry to defeat local smokefree air ordinances.
http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/11/4/305.full
Research examines the tobacco industry's strategy to avoid regulations on secondhand smoke exposure in Latin America.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/hkn14e00
Article in Science reports the tobacco industry has been bullying scientists, according to researchers who lead the campaign against secondhand smoke.
http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/91/11/1749
Article in the American Journal of Public Health chronicles the efforts of the tobacco industry to attack the evidence that secondhand smoke causes disease.
http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/full/91/11/1749
Article in the American Journal of Public Health on Philip Morris's worldwide "sound science" program to set impossible standards of proof for the study of secondhand smoke.
http://www.no-smoke.org/getthefacts.php?dp=d20
Examines tobacco industry strategy to fight effective clean indoor air measures: ventilation.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/279/19/1566?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Why+Review+Articles+on+the+Health+Effects+of+Passive+Smoking+Reach+Different+Conclusions&searchid=1067862394764_827&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&journalcode=jama
Statistical analysis of the research literature on secondhand smoke finds "the only factor associated with concluding that passive smoking is not harmful was whether an author was affiliated with the tobacco industry".
Home > Society > Issues > Health > Tobacco > Advocacy > Pro-Tobacco > Critiques > Secondhand Smoke
Thanks to DMOZ, which built a great web directory for nearly two decades and freely shared it with the web. About us