Home > Health > Medicine > Evidence Based Medicine > Opposing Views
Evidence-based medicine and its methodology, although now widely accepted, is still the subject of considerable critical assessment and debate, and the entries in this subcategory are intended to represent the broad range of critical assessment and appreciation of EBM from a number of perspectives.
http://skynet.ohsu.edu/~hersh/ijmi-04-ebm.pdf
An examination and assessment of a decade of critiques of EBM, categorized into five major themes. [2004]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC169187/
A review of criticisms of EBM as being founded on a lack of clarity and precision by EBM's own proponents.
http://pamw.pl/sites/default/files/inv_rev_Jassem.pdf
A review of the most common shortcomings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as used in evidence-based medicine, with particular focus on publication bias. [2016]
http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/article.aspx?articleid=1085845
A critique of evidence-based medicine, especially its EBM-grading construct, as scientifically unsound. Part of a Point/Counterpoint exchange on EBM from the Chest journal. [2008]
http://skynet.ohsu.edu/~hersh/ebcm-04-ebm.pdf
Brief review of five major types of criticisms of EBM.
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Pharmacology/dc-bits/holmes-deconstruction-ebhc-06.pdf
The article that initiated the critical controversy surrounding the claim that EBM represents an exclusionary "regime of power".
http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3725.long
Argues that although evidence based medicine has had many benefits, it has also had some negative unintended consequences; the authors provide some constructive suggestions for addressing these concerns and limitations. [2014]
http://www.annals.in/article.asp?issn=0971-9784;year=2011;volume=14;issue=1;spage=3;epage=5;aulast=Kapoor
HASH(0xbe920e0)
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)62286-2/fulltext
A follow-up, 15 years hence (2010), of the lanmark audit in 1995, of the extent to which general medical inpatients were managed in an evidence-based manner in a large tertiary teaching hospital,. [2013]
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?pid=S0256-95742013000700016&script=sci_arttext
Presents some limitations of EBM, especially the mistaking of statistical significance with clinical significance / relevance. [2013]
http://www.cmaj.ca/content/163/7/837.full
Review of the most commonly leveled charges against, and misperceptions about, evidence-based medicine, with proposed solutions to real limitations.
http://ijme.in/articles/evidence-based-medicine-can-the-evidence-be-trusted/?galley=html
Explores the problem of untrustworthy evidence, its sources and impact on quality in evidence-based medicine. [2011]
http://www.onclive.com/publications/oncology-live/2013/september-2013/Evidence-Based-Medicine-Examining-the-Gap-Between-Rhetoric-and-Reality
A plea for a more thoughtful and critical re-examination of evidence-based medicine as it relates to optimal and personalized cancer management. [2013]
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Fulltext/2005/06000/Evidence_Based_Medicine__Haute_Couture_or_the.46.aspx
An examination of some strengths and weaknesses of evidence-based medicine as it relates to the practice of anesthesiology.
http://mh.bmj.com/content/31/1/23.full
A critical evaluation of the oft-cited criticism of evidence-based medicine as constraining clinical freedom and potentially compromising patient welfare. Published: 03/01/05. [Requires registration.]
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.12147/full
A sustained critique of evidence-based medicine's lack of independence given its high degree of industry-sponsored studies, but also offering some constructive suggestions for potential solutions. [2014]
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020107
Argues and discusses the reasons for the limited relevance of systematic reviews to frontline health care workers in developing countries. [2005]
http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/article.aspx?articleid=1085844
A defense of evidence-based medicine as an evolving and highly individualized, patient-centered approach to clinical decision making. Part of a Point/Counterpoint exchange on EBM from the Chest journal. [2008]
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/180/1/8?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1127920476751_4679&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&volume=180&firstpage=8&resourcetype=1
A psychiatrist's critique that over-emphasis on evidence-based medicine oversimplifies the complex and interpersonal nature of clinical care.
http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=/CJN/CJN40_04/S0317167100014542a.pdf&code=97d58b3738d791d8535dff80e4f96db5
Critical review of progress in, and limitations, of evidence-based medcine methodology over the two decades since inception. [2013]
http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=/CJN/CJN40_04/S0317167100014554a.pdf&code=cbc40d6a5ea07503d4063bbf512011e1
Critical review of progress in, and limitations, of evidence-based medcine over the two decades since inception. [2013]
http://apt.rcpsych.org/content/8/5/326.full
A critique of conventional randomized controlled trials methodology, and an attempt to incorporate more complex interventions via a new 'pragmatic RCT'.
http://www.donaldmiller.com/Real_World_Failure_of_Evidence-Based_Medicine.pdf
Argues that EBM is an ad hoc construct and not a valid basis for medical decision-making. [2011]
http://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-015-0917-5
Critical examination of four important ways in which the evidence from randomised trials is limited or partial, that are claimed to undermine the evidence that such trials provide for decision-making. [2015]
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/1153248?pageNumber=1
Argues that there is insufficient proof that the EBM model can be adapted to fit psychiatry. (April 1, 2008).
Home > Health > Medicine > Evidence Based Medicine > Opposing Views
Thanks to DMOZ, which built a great web directory for nearly two decades and freely shared it with the web. About us