Directory of Education Resources

Home > Health > Medicine > Evidence Based Medicine > Education

For tutorials, online courses, manuals and instructional articles about evidence-based medicine (EBM).

Resources in This Category

• A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1227410/pdf/cmaj_156_10_1411.pdf
  The seminal paper on how to resolve discordance across systematic reviews, from the eminent expert Alejandro Jadad at McMaster University. [1997]

• A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine

  http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/15/39
  Clinical trial comparing a blended learning (BL) versus didactic learning (DL) approach for teaching EBM, concluding that a multifaceted approach incorporating BL may be best suited for medical students. [2015]

• A review of grading systems for evidence-based guidelines produced by medical specialties

  http://www.clinmed.rcpjournal.org/content/10/4/358.long
  Compares and evaluates the optimum grading system (SIGN, GRADE, GATE and NSF-LTC) for the type of guideline being developed or question being addressed by a specialist society. [2010]

• ABC Health Matters: Getting Evidence-Based Treatment

  http://www.abc.net.au/health/consumerguides/stories/2006/10/25/1837390.htm
  Consumer guide to understanding and applying the concepts of evidence-based medicine to treatment.

• Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology

  http://cco.amegroups.com/article/view/4210/5898
  Discusses the nature, types, and pros and cons of adaptive designs in oncology trials that use accumulating data to modify the ongoing trial without undermining the integrity and validity of the trial. [2014]

• Adaptive Clinical Trials: The Promise and the Caution

  http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/29/6/606.short
  Critically examines the potential benefits and disadvantages of adaptive trial designs, which use accumulating results in the trial to modify the trial's course. [2010]

• Adaptive design methods in clinical trials - a review

  http://ojrd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1750-1172-3-11
  A review of adaptive clinical trial design and adpative randomization, examining their impact, challenges, obstacles, and strategies for effective deployment. [2008]

• Applying Evidence-Based Medicine in Actual Clinical Practice: Can We Bridge the Gap? A Review of the Literature

  http://www.hellenicjcardiol.org/archive/full_text/2015/5/2015_5_373.pdf
  Examines the effect of EBM in changing physicians’ attitude towards clinical guidelines, and describes the facilitators and barriers to implementing those clinical guidelines in clinical practice. [2015]

• Appraisal Tools for Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review

  http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082915
  Systematic review of guideline appraisal tools identifying and comparing existing tools and their relative degrees of validation. [2013]

• Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

  http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=479334
  Provides criteria to use to critically appraise systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and documents some of the key pitfalls of each. [2003]

• Are randomized trials obsolete or more important than ever in the genomic era?

  http://genomemedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gm436
  Given rapid development of new genomic biomarkers, this paper explores whether and how we can make randomized trials more adaptable to a changing landscape, and whether we still need such trials at all. [2013]

• Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the design, analysis, and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies

  http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/103/4/965.long
  An overview of the design, analysis, and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies, with a special emphasis on assumptions and limitations, and an examination of different analytic strategies for strengthening causal inference. [2016]

• BMC Medicine | Full text | Trustworthy guidelines – excellent; customized care tools –

  http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/199
  Examination of how to develop trustworthy clinical practice guidelines that besides examining what is medically best also allow consistency with patients’ priorities, concerns, and preferences, thus delivering customized care at the level of individuals and their families. [2015]

• CDR Systematic Reviews: Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care

  http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htm
  Exceptionally detailed handbook of the procedures necessary to conduct a systematic review. From the authoritative Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) at the University of York, publisher of DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects).

• Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine

  http://www.cebm.net/
  Provides workshops, resources and background information for healthcare professionals, with research tools and educational material to download. Based at Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Oxford.

• Class of evidence (CoE): how does it relate to critical appraisal?

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3516459/
  Discussion of study validity and the assessment of different forms of bias. [2012]

• Cochrane Library Tutorial

  http://learntech.physiol.ox.ac.uk/cochrane_tutorial/cochlibd0e4.php
  A twelve part nimated multi-part visual tutorial on the use and search of the Cochrane Library, developed by Oxford University.

• Critical Appraisal

  http://www.criticalappraisal.com/
  Learn to read clinical papers with confidence with courses on critical appraisal and evidence-based medicine

• Developing clinical practice guidelines

  http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-7-61
  A 'how to' guide to the development of clinical practice guidelines, including synthesis, grading, presentation and the derivation of recommendations. [2012]

• Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs): comparing approaches

  http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-3-45
  Critical review of six clinical practice guidelines development handbooks.

• Ethical concerns about adaptive randomization

  http://ctj.sagepub.com/content/12/2/101.full
  Raises serious questions about the ethical propriety of adaptive designs where the probability of being assigned to one treatment versus its comparator is dependent on emerging data. [2015]

• Evaluating Guidelines: A Review of Key Quality Criteria

  http://www.aerzteblatt.de/int/archive/article?id=171192
  A review of guideline-assessing instruments, finding that alongside the comprehensive instruments such as AGREE II and DELBI, rapid-assessment instruments can be convenient tools for gaining a quick impression of the value of a guideline. [2015]

• Evaluating the evidence for evidence-based medicine: are randomized clinical trials less flawed than other forms of peer-reviewed medical research?

  http://www.fasebj.org/content/27/9/3430.long
  Critical review of RCT and non-RCT studies, finding that the implementation of RCT methods and the interpretation of the results can be flawed by poor trial design, observer bias, incentive bias, or simple misinterpretation. [2013]

• Evidence Based Calculator

  http://moosenose.com/EBCalculator.htm
  Free downloadable calculator computing sensitivity and selectivity, control event rates, numbers-needed-to-treat, and other evidence-based factors.

• Evidence Based Medicine - Research and Subject Guides

  http://researchguides.uic.edu/ebm
  This guide, tabbed by topic, is designed to assist health care professionals and students become effective and efficient users of the medical literature; includes a resource collection and glossary. From the University of Illinois at Chicago.

• Evidence Based Medicine - Talks and Resources

  http://ebm.bmj.com/site/resources/index.xhtml
  Collection of fulltext copies of talks about evidence-based medicine.

• Evidence Based Medicine and Clinical Practice Guidelines

  https://learn.amia.org/system/scidea/learning_resources/53/original/2B-1_Hoyt-Hersh__EBM__and_clinical_practice_guidelines_CX.pdf
  Instructional review of the processes required to create and implement an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. [2014]

• Evidence Based Medicine Information

  http://jeffline.tju.edu/Education/courses/informatics/activities/ebm_info.html
  A tutorial on basic concepts, including a guide to searching literature and databases. From Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.

• Evidence based medicine: increasing, not dictating, choice

  http://www.bmj.com/content/334/suppl_1/s10.full
  A defense of evidence-based medicine from the perspective of women's health concerns.

• Evidence in practice - EBM Part IV

  http://adc.bmj.com/content/90/8/849.full
  Fourth of a four-part comprehensive mini-course on Evidence-Based Medicine; covers a sample clinical scenario through the process of the art of formulating answerable clinical questions, finding evidence, critically appraising evidence, and putting evidence into practice.

• Evidence-based mapping of design heterogeneity prior to meta-analys

  http://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-4053-3-80
  Demonstrates an assessment of sugar-sweetened beverages and type 2 diabetes as an example to show how the new technique called ‘evidence mapping’ can be used to organize studies and evaluate design heterogeneity prior to meta-analysis. [2014]

• Evidence-Based Medicine

  https://repository.unm.edu/bitstream/handle/1928/24226/Evidence-Based%20Medicine.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Concise review of the essential concepts and implementation of evidence-based medicine. [2014]

• Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett

  http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(16)00147-5/fulltext
  Reflections growing out of a conversation by John Ioannidis with David Sackett in 2004 about evidence-based medicine (EBM), the movement Sackett had spearheaded, updated to developments through 2016. [2016]

• Evidence-Based Medicine in Iberoamerica: Problems and Possible Solutions

  http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020277
  Discussion of the applicability of evidence-based medicine in Latin American countries.

• Evidence-Based Medicine: A Unified Approach

  http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/24/1/9.full
  Proposes an integration of the two approaches to evidence-based medicine, evidence-based guidelines (EBG) and evidence-based individual decision making (EBID). [2005]

• Evidence-based Medicine: Ten Top Things to Know!

  http://www.jaypeejournals.com/eJournals/ShowText.aspx?ID=2829&Type=FREE&TYP=TOP&IN=_eJournals/images/JPLOGO.gif&IID=222&isPDF=YES
  A compact primer on evidence-based medicine, from basic definitions to fundamentals principles, with tips and commentary. [2012]

• Evidence-Based Medicine: Useful Tools for Decision Making

  https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2001/174/5/evidence-based-medicine-useful-tools-decision-making
  An article from the Medical Journal of Australia explains the basic processes and concepts, with descriptions of common computer-assisted research tools.

• Evidence-Based Practice: A Practice Manual

  http://www.lenus.ie/hse/bitstream/10147/317326/1/EBPManual.pdf
  Details the basic steps of evidence-based practice and provides signposts to more detailed information and assistance. Compiled by the Evidence-Based Practice Group South East and the Health Service Executive of Ireland. [2014]

• Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing for Outcome and Analysis Reporting Biases When Comparing Medical Interventions

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174882/
  Guidelines for when and how to search, and assess, "grey literature" (typically non-peer-reviewed conference abstracts, books, dissertations, regulatory reports, etc.) when conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis. From Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). [2013]

• Global health: the importance of evidence-based medicine

  http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/223
  Compilation of presentations on how evidence-based medicine in resource-limited settings can be translated into improved health outcomes. [2013]

• GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

  http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/336/7650/924?ijkey=8f20c7c3da0ec780d5e7f5ca92fcb60abe52aaef&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha
  The advantages of the GRADE system for rating the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

• GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation

  http://www.teachepi.org/documents/courses/grade/HJS_GRADE_Montreal_2010.pdf
  Comprehensive (74 pp., as downloadable PDF) tutorial on GRADE, the leading consensus approach to grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. From McMaster University.

• Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise

  http://www.cmaj.ca/content/186/3/E123.full
  Compilation of a comprehensive checklist of items linked to the relevant resources and tools that guideline developers should consider. [2014]

• How to conduct a systematic or evidence-based literature review

  http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/authors/guides/write/evidence_based.htm
  Five-part author's guide to performing systematic reviews; illustrated, with examples. [2013]

• How to do a meta-analysis

  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1348/000711010X502733/pdf
  Comprehensive guide to the process of conducting meta-analysis: selecting articles, inclusion criteria, effect sizes, practical analysis execution, and estimating publication bias. From the British Psychological Society.

• How to Do Random Allocation (Randomization)

  http://ecios.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103
  Describes and illustrates with practical examples the concept and procedure of random allocation as used in randomized controlled trials/studies (RCTs), including simple, block and stratified randomization. [2014]

• I-SPY 2 may change how clinical trials are conducted

  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.28172/full
  Describes I-SPY, a groundbreaking dynamic adaptive randomization model for accelerating both identification and regulatory approval of effective investigational agents. [2013]

• Improving Clinical Trial Efficiency: Thinking outside the Box | 2015 Educational Book | Meeting Libr

  http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/content/11500141-156
  Improving Clinical Trial Efficiency: Thinking outside the Box

• Inconsistent selection and definition of local and regional endpoints in breast cancer research

  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bjs.9644/full
  Review of which locoregional endpoints are used in studies of breast cancer, and how these endpoints and their components are defined. [2014]

• Introduction to Evidence Based Medicine

  http://www.slideshare.net/featherr/inds-ebm-introlecturejan2013topost
  Slide presentation given to second year medical students on the principles of evidence-based medcine. From the Faculty of Medicine at McGill University (Montreal, Canada).

• Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine

  http://guides.mclibrary.duke.edu/ebmtutorial
  A self-paced tutorial on the principles and processes, designed for healthcare practitioners and students. From the Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.

• Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM)

  http://medlib.bu.edu/tutorials/ebm/intro/
  A five minute tutorial, with inbuilt self-assessment, from the Boston University Medical Library.

• Introduction to Evidence-based Practice

  http://media.elsevierhealth.com.au/media/blfa_files/9780729541350.pdf
  Provides a summary of the principles, processes, and foundations of evidence-based decision making. Chapter from "Evidence-based Practice Across the Health Professions". [2013]

• Introduction to Meta Analysis

  https://peerj.com/preprints/665v1.pdf
  Comprehensive guide to conducting a meta-analysis, including a detailed case study (43 pp.). [2014]

• Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting

  http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/44/2/496.long
  An overview of the methodological approaches used in Mendelian randomization studies, with a discussion of MR assumptions and reporting of statistical methods. and a checklist for the reporting of MR studies. [2015]

• Mendelian randomization: where are we now and where are we going?

  http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/44/2/379.long
  Critical review of the current status of and progress in Mendelian randomization studies, along with its potential limitations. [2015]

• Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do

  https://smw.ch/archives-search/article-detail/?tx_ezmjournal_articledetail[identifier]=smw.2012.13518
  Critical examination of the pros and caveats about meta-analysis, and how the limitations can be overcome; also includes a illustrative case vignette. From CEB, the Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. [2012]

• Meta-analysis as Evidence:  Building a Better Pyramid

  http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1895230
  Critically examines the issue of what category of evidence should be placed at the peak of the evidence-based hierarchy/pyramid, either the randomized clinical trial (RCT), or the systematic review with meta-analysis (SR/MA), then outlines how to improve the value of meta-analytic evidence. [2014]

• Meta-analysis in medical research

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049418/
  An introduction to and rationale for meta-analysis, including presentation, interpretation, and biases. [2010]

• Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations

  http://www.ccjm.org/index.php?id=107937&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=360745
  Critical examination of key issues of study identification and selection; publication, search and selection bias; results heterogeneity, and data analysis. [2008]

• Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868184/
  Practical guidelines for minimizing the risk of conducting a mediocre meta-analysis and for supporting researchers to accurately evaluate the published findings. [2013]

• MyGeneralPractice

  http://www.racgp.org.au/your-practice/guidelines/
  Resources and including evidence-based guidelines for primary care providers . From The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP).

• Navigating the Maze

  https://www.hsl.virginia.edu/collections/ebm/index.cfm
  The University of Virginia School of Medicine presents a guide to using web-based medical search engines, with links to the major resources.

• Observational and interventional study design types; an overview | Biochemia Medica

  http://www.biochemia-medica.com/2014/24/199
  Review of the strengths and weaknesses of observational versus interventional study design. [2014]

• Observational Evidence and Strength of Evidence Domains: Case Examples

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK202087/
  Demonstrates how observational studies may provide moderate- to (rarely) high-strength evidence in systematic reviews. [2014]

• Patterns of ‘leakage’ in the utilisation of clinical guidelines: a systematic review -- Mickan et al

  http://pmj.bmj.com/content/87/1032/670.full
  A systematic review of barriers to guideline implementation through an examination of rates of awareness and agreement and adoption and/or adherence, along with a call for recommendations to improve guideline adherence.

• Practising EBM

  http://ktclearinghouse.ca/cebm/practise/
  Interative tips from the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine on formulating clinical questions and conducting critical appraisals, accompanying the text "Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM".

• Principles of evidence based medicine - EBM Part I

  http://adc.bmj.com/content/90/8/837.full
  First of a four-part comprehensive mini-course on Evidence-Based Medicine; covers basic EBM principles and motivation.

• Progress in Evidence-Based Medicine

  http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=182722
  Assessment of where we stand in evidence-based medicine as of 2008.

• Proposal for Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trials: The STEEP System

  http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/15/2127.long
  Standard definitions for efficacy end points and events in early-stage adjuvant breast cancer clinical trials, from Memorial Sloan Kettering. [2007]

• R in Clinical Research

  http://r-clinical-research.com/
  Presentation on the use of the R statistical package in Evidence-Based Medicine, especially in Clinical Research, intended mainly for, but not limited to, Bio-statisticians, especially those using SAS.

• Random Allocation in Controlled Clinical Trials: A Review

  http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/JPPS/article/view/21494/16480
  An update on and clarification of various random allocation techniques, especially simple randomization, blocking, stratified random allocation, and minimization, and a critique of non-random approaches. [2014]

• Randomised controlled trials and population-based observational research

  http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v110/n3/full/bjc2013725a.html
  Reviews the distinct roles, occasional tensions, and relative strengths and limitations of RCTs versus population-based observational studies, proposed as complementary forms of research. [2014]

• Randomization: beyond tossing a coin

  http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132016000500310&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
  A review of common randomization strategies, and how to choose betweeen them. [2016]

• Rating Evidence in Medical Literature

  http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2011/01/pfor2-1101.html
  An overview of several evidence grading systems, including the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, and the journal of the American Academy of Family Physicians. From the AMA Virtual Mentor project. [2011]

• Reading And Critically Appraising Systematic Reviews And Meta-Analyses

  http://www.journal-of-hepatology.eu/article/S0168-8278(05)00489-7/fulltext
  The cautions needed in reading and conducting a systematic review, especially strong on sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, sub-group analysis, publication bias and missing data. [2005]

• Research Trends in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis of More than 50 Years of Publication Data

  http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121054
  A bibliometric analysis examing the scientific productivity of EBM research and publication trends over decades. [2015]

• Statistical methods for evidence-based medicine: the diagnostic test. Part I

  http://www.minervamedica.it/en/freedownload.php?cod=R02Y2008N07A0431
  Part I of a two part series on how to select and interpret diagnostic tests to confirm or exclude a diagnosis, using a full working example. [PDF]

• Statistical methods for evidence-based medicine: the diagnostic test. Part II

  http://www.minervamedica.it/en/freedownload.php?cod=R02Y2008N09A0481
  Part II of a two part series on how to select and interpret diagnostic tests to confirm or exclude a diagnosis, using a full working example.

• Survival End Point Reporting in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Review of Major Journals

  http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/26/22/3721.full
  Evaluation of the reporting of survival end points in cancer RCTs. [2008]

• Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology

  http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/116/17/3140.long
  Detailed exposition of all the critical procedures of conducting SRs and MAs, with invaluable tips and guides, including on the use of the Cochrane automatic SR/MA software tool RevMan.

• Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When One Study Is Just not Enough

  http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/3/1/253.full
  Discusses the strengths and limitations of narrative and systematic reviews and meta-analyses and how to critically appraise them. [2008]

• Systematic Reviews

  http://lgdata.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/docs/2063/1270730/Finding_Evidence_for_Systematic_Reviews.pdf
  Essentials of systematic reviews, and a step-by-step guide for how to conduct one. From Library Services of King's College, London. [2014]

• Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

  http://www.teachepi.org/courses/sr&ma.htm
  Exceptional learning resource: a comprehensive (300+ pp. as slides) course on the systematic review process, on their strengths and limitations, with step-by-step guidance, examples and case studies on how to perform a quality systematic review. In six downloadable (as PDFs) lessons, from McGill University.

• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a step-by-step guide

  http://www.ccace.ed.ac.uk/research/software-resources/systematic-reviews-and-meta-analyses
  Detailed guidance on how to conduct a systematic review or meta-analysis, with accompanying lectures developed by the University of Edinburgh's Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE).

• Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of preclinical studies

  http://jcb.sagepub.com/content/34/5/737.full
  Discusses and details the important concept of conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses for preclinical (in vitro and in vovo) research. [2014]

• Teaching Critical Appraisal of Medical Evidence

  http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2013/01/medu1-1301.html
  Presents three practical methods for actively teaching critical appraisal skills in an evidence-based medicine curriculum. [2013]

• The Care and Feeding of Evidence Based Medicine

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3332120/?report=classic
  Overview of the precepts of EBM and reflections on some current issues affecting its progress. [2012]

• The Evidence-based Practice Center Experience

  http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=718512
  Guide to the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program within the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). [2005]

• The Heart of the Matter of Opinion and Evidence: The Value of Evidence-Based Medicine

  http://www.ochsnerjournal.org/doi/full/10.1043/1524-5012-12.1.57
  Strong defense of EBM, by reviewing practical examples of conflicting topics that evidence-based medicine has positively clarified to allow providing the best possible patient care. [2012]

• The Hierarchy of Evidence: From Unsystematic Clinical Observations to Systematic Reviews

  http://www.libreriauniverso.it/pdf/9780387885544.pdf
  Summary and critical review of hierarchies of evidence, contrasting the different current approaches and noting their limitations and merits. Chapter from "Neurology: An Evidence-Based Approach". [2012]

• The Levels of Evidence and their role in Evidence-Based Medicine

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124652/
  The origin of levels of evidence and their relevance to the EBM, with examples drawn from the field of plastic surgery. [2012]

• The need for caution in interpreting high quality systematic reviews

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1121240/?tool=pubmed
  Practical lessons on the highly variable quality of systematic reviews themselves, with an illustrative case study showing how different systematic reviews on the same question can arrive at opposite conclusions. [2001]

• The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search

  http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692007000300023&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en&ORIGINALLANG=en
  How to use the PICO Strategy for the construction of an appropriate research question and review of the literature.

• The random allocation process: two things you need to know

  https://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0030-1267062
  Describes the random allocation process, and the associated methods of allocation concealment. [2010]

• The Role of Experience in an Evidence-Based Practice

  http://themedicalroundtable.com/article/role-experience-evidence-based-practice
  Drs. Gordon Guyatt and Mark Tonelli participate in this Expert Roundtable Discussion to address how they see the role of expert opinion changing in the evolving framework of what is now considered the outmoded “evidence-based hierarchy” popularized over the past 20 years. [2012]

• The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index

  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435613004666
  Discusses how significant results of many RCTs hinge on very few events, and suggests that reporting the number of events required to make a statistically significant result nonsignificant (the Fragility Index) in RCTs can allow for more informed decisions about the confidence warranted by reported RCT results. [2014]

• The Usefulness of Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies

  http://ilarjournal.oxfordjournals.org/content/55/3/427.full
  Details how the design, conduct, and analysis of animal experiments may be optimized through the use of systematic reviews. [2014]

• Tips for Learners of Evidence-Based Medicine: Measures of Precision

  http://www.cmaj.ca/content/171/6/611.full?etoc
  Explains the use of confidence intervals in testing hypotheses. From the Canadian Medical Association Journal. [English and French]

• Tips for Learners of Evidence-Based Medicine: Relative Risk Reduction

  http://www.cmaj.ca/content/171/4/353.full?etoc
  Describes how to estimate a treatment's effectiveness and explains the concepts of risk reduction, and number needed to treat. From the Canadian Medical Association Journal. [English and French]

• Tips for Teachers of Evidence-Based Medicine: Adjusting for Prognostic Imbalances (Confounding Variables) in Studies on Therapy or Harm

  http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-007-0391-1
  Teaching tips on confounding variables and the statistical adjustment for differences in prognostic variables. From the Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group.

• Tips for Teachers of Evidence-based Medicine: Clinical Prediction Rules (CPRs) and Estimating Pretest Probability

  http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-008-0623-z
  Teaching tips on the use of clinical prediction rules in applying evidence consistently in everyday clinical practice. From the Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group.

• Tips for Teachers of Evidence-based Medicine: Making Sense of Diagnostic Test Results Using Likelihood Ratios

  http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-007-0330-1
  Teaching tips on using likelihood ratios. From the Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group.

• Tips for Teachers of Evidence-Based Medicine: Understanding Odds Ratios and Their Relationship to Risk Ratios

  http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-007-0453-4
  Discriminates odds from risks, and the nature of an odds ratio as an alternative to a risk ratio. From the Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group.

• Trials and Tribulations of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

  http://asheducationbook.hematologylibrary.org/content/2007/1/493.long
  Guidance on some of the major limitations besetting systematic reviews (including limited datasets, unpublished data, and both statistical and clinical heterogeneity). [2007]

• Understanding randomised controlled trials - EBM Part II

  http://adc.bmj.com/content/90/8/840.full
  Second of a four-part comprehensive mini-course on Evidence-Based Medicine; covers the purpose, design and different types of RCTs.

• Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis - EBM Part III

  http://adc.bmj.com/content/90/8/845.full
  Third of a four-part comprehensive mini-course on Evidence-Based Medicine; covers the principles, methodology and appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including use of odds ratios and relative risks.

• Use of Multiple Endpoints and Approval Paths Depicts a Decade of FDA Oncology Drug Approvals

  http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/19/14/3722.long
  Explores the historic use of different endpoints, and the associated degree of regulatory flexibility shown, by the FDA to support regular and accelerated approval of cancer drugs. [2013]

• What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?

  http://www.bmj.com/content/336/7651/995.full
  Reviews multiple alternative systems for rating the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

• Worth Adapting? Revisiting the Usefulness of Outcome-Adaptive Randomization

  http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/18/17/4498.long
  Describes the potential superiority in well-defined cases of adaptive randomization which allocates more patients to the better treatments as the data accumulates in the trial. [2012]

Related Categories

• Home > Health > Medicine > Education

 

Home > Health > Medicine > Evidence Based Medicine > Education

 

---

 

Thanks to DMOZ, which built a great web directory for nearly two decades and freely shared it with the web. About us