Home > Computers > Software > Operating Systems > Unix > SCO > Boycott, Lawsuits > GNU GPL
This category is for links that are mostly or all about GNU (FSF) General Public License (GPL), aspects of, and involvement in, the SCO vs. IBM lawsuit, and related actions.
http://lwn.net/Articles/44902/
According to Mark Heise of Boies, Schiller, and Flexner; SCO outside law firm, GNU GPL, by which Linux kernel and much other code is licensed, is invalid due to being preempted by US copyright law. Forum comments. [LWN: Linux Weekly News]
http://www.sco.com/copyright/
CEO issues another open letter; challenges legal status of GPL with what SCO says are legal precedents that will terminate the idea of copyleft. [SCO]
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1016-1016020.html
Some organizations argue SCO shipping a Linux product undermines its current attack on Linux intellectual property underpinnings; SCO says argument baseless; issue spotlights key tenet of GPL governing Linux kernel. [CNET News.com]
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Did-SCO-Violate-the-GPL/
Some open source community members claim SCO violated GNU GPL by copying source code from Linux kernel into SCO Unix Linux Kernel Personality feature without releasing changes publicly or showing attribution copyright notice. [eWeek]
http://linuxtoday.com/developer/2003092901526NWCDLL
SCO response to IBM countersuit; GPL never faced full legal test, SCO says it will fall in court; SCO continues to base its legal claims on well-settled United States contract and copyright laws. Forum comments. [Linux Today]
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1004961/sco-defies-logic-selling-samba-invalid-gpl
Samba team issued statement on SCO including Samba in its latest release of Unixware. Samba is distributed under GNU GPL. For SCO to keep using open source software when attacking others for such is hypocrisy. [The Inquirer]
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1018136/sco-neat-gpl
Reader email shows that SCO-Caldera changed their policy about GPL quickly, documents this with quote from SCO website: this material is provided AS-IS and at no charge. [The Inquirer]
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/SCO-Group-Launches-Broadside-Against-GPL/
Open letter by CEO Darl McBride gives view on key issue of US copyright law versus GNU GPL; warns that current legal controversies will rage for at least another 18 months, until original case against IBM goes to trial. [eWeek]
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1020959/sco-recycle-at-amp-t-unix-blunder
Reports say SCO may have violated GNU General Public License, GPL; eWeek says parts of Linux kernel code were copied into Unix System V source tree by former or current SCO employees. [The Inquirer]
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1002028/sco-argue-general-public-licence-invalid
Today's Wall Street Journal quotes SCO outside lawyer Mark Heise saying GPL is preempted by US federal copyright law; GPL license lets software and work derived from it be copied by anyone at no charge. [The Inquirer]
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1028573/sco-pages-suggest-gpl-knowledge
Reader letters with links and quotes from SCO website showing SCO use of GPL principles, with some insightful comments. [The Inquirer]
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/08/19/the_gpl_will_win_claims/
Eben Moglen, Professor of Law, Columbia University, FSF pro bono general counsel for last decade, says no need to fear GPL being tested in US Court, astonished by latest SCO legal tactic to reject GPL validity. [The Register]
Home > Computers > Software > Operating Systems > Unix > SCO > Boycott, Lawsuits > GNU GPL
Thanks to DMOZ, which built a great web directory for nearly two decades and freely shared it with the web. About us