Home > Computers > Open Source > Open Content > Encyclopedias > Wikipedia > Commentary
Coverage of Wikipedia in the press, blogs, and elsewhere.
http://cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/08/03/wikipedia/
Short article describing one individual's experiences.
http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_12/ciffolilli/
Journal article by Andrea Ciffolilli. Explains the success of Wikipedia thanks to a solution to the problem of the submission of undesirable pieces of information.
http://www.frozennorth.org/C2011481421/E652809545/index.html
Weblog entry. Describes the author's process of putting errors into Wikipedia and watching for corrections to them. Suggests how fact-checking needs to be improved at Wikipedia, and gives ideas for further experiments.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2004/oct/26/g2.onlinesupplement
Summary primarily of the positive aspects and milestones of the online encyclopedia.
http://www.itworld.com/040614wikipedia
Chinese censors have blocked access to Chinese Wikipedia that was created as a free and open source of information.
http://www.salon.com/2004/04/27/wikipedia_3/
Attempts to examine the pros and cons of Wikipedia. Plus, comparisons to previous similar projects.
http://slashdot.org/story/04/07/28/1351230/Wikipedia-Founder-Jimmy-Wales-Responds
Wikipedia founder responds to a dozen highly moderated questions.
http://slashdot.org/story/04/09/21/0027241/Wikipedia-Hits-Million-Entry-Mark
Lovely forum discussion.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia
Provides a critical review of Wikipedia.
http://www.ideasinactiontv.com/tcs_daily/2004/11/the-faith-based-encyclopedia.html
Robert McHenry, former Editor in Chief of the Encyclopædia Britannica, wonders about the Wikipedian assumptions that writings and editings by contributors of greatest expertise will survive and that articles will eventually reach a very high degree of accuracy.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/23/wiki_fiddlers_big_book/
Commentary by Andrew Orlowski. "Our jibe that the Wikipedia is the world's most useless encyclopedia drew precisely two angry responses. But both illustrate the condition perfectly."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/07/khmer_rouge_in_daipers/
Opinion article by Andrew Orlowski suggesting that Wikipedia has a long way to go before it's a stand-in for libraries and scholarly publications.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/15/emergent_people_fail_to_impress/
Criticisms of Wikipedia and of arguments used by its admirers in an article by Andrew Orlowski.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2004-11-05-fifthofnovember_x.htm
Overview of Wikipedia's growth, quality, and editing process.
http://online.journalism.utexas.edu/2004/papers/wikipedia.pdf
Studies the growth of Wikipedia and analyzes the technologies and policies that made it prosper.
http://bluwiki.com/go/BoycottWikipedia
Criticism and Boycott Campaign towards Wikipedia
http://wikipediareview.com/
Forum dedicated to criticism of Wikipedia, along with editorials from the moderators.
http://wikipediocracy.com/
A critical review site examining Wikipedia's flaws and follies. Blog and forum.
http://wikizine.blogspot.com/
News bulletin on Wikimedia Foundation's projects by a steward and old-timer editor. [English, Español, Deutsch, Indonesia]
Home > Computers > Open Source > Open Content > Encyclopedias > Wikipedia > Commentary
Thanks to DMOZ, which built a great web directory for nearly two decades and freely shared it with the web. About us