Home > Arts > Literature > World Literature > British > Shakespeare > Authorship > Stratfordians
This category is for sites arguing that Shakespeare is indeed the author of the works attributed to him.
http://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/shake_did_write_plays.html
Evidence that suggests Shakespeare did write the plays attributed to him.
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ahnelson/authorsh.html
Evidence in favor of Shakespeare; background on Edward de Vere and others who are part of the authorship debate.
http://members.shaw.ca/chazzpeppin/shakespeare.html
Brief essay favoring Stratford.
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ahnelson/witness.html
Private notes, book-lists, and title-page inscriptions that evince Shakespeare's reputation as the author of his works.
http://www.folger.edu/
Covering the library, visitor information, exhibitions, museum shop, teaching Shakespeare theatre productions, poetry, the Folger Consort, PEN/Faulkner readings and lectures.
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ahnelson/BUC/discuss.html
Evidence in favor of Shakespeare.
http://www.angelfire.com/journal/WillShakespeare/WilliamShakespeare10.html
Two short sketches: background on authorship; a biography.
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ahnelson/snl.html
Thomas A. Pendleton's review of the Alan H. Nelson book, which argues in favor of Shakespeare's authorship.
http://www.ericchrist.com/non-fiction/shakespeare.htm
Examining the Shakespeare authorship debate.
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ahnelson/pbs.html
Commentary on the Diana Price appearance in the program.
http://stromata.tripod.com/id288_march_16_2002.htm
The first in an occasional series analyzing a new anti-Stratfordian tract.
http://stromata.tripod.com/id317_april_27_2002.htm
Refutes evidence presented in Joseph Sobran's annual column.
http://stromata.tripod.com/id317_january_5_2003.htm
An update circa August 2003.
http://stromata.tripod.com/id459_february_15_2004.htm
Anti-Stratfordian Peter W. Dickson obtains a forum in The Weekly Standard for his thesis that Shakespeare of Stratford's (alleged) Roman Catholicism disproves his authorship of the works that bear his name.
http://stromata.tripod.com/id317_october_10_2002.htm
Refutation of some recent anti-Stratfordian works.
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ahnelson/literacy.html
Commentary on literacy amongst actors during Shakespeare's time, and whether it might be used as a determining factor in the authorship debate.
http://shakespeareauthorship.com/
This page is dedicated to the proposition that Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare. Anti-Oxfordian arguments from a traditional point of view.
http://stromata.tripod.com/id288_march_11_2002.htm
Analyzes the anti-Stratfordian position that William Shakespeare was too prosperous, contented and bourgeois a figure ever to have written poems like Shakespeare’s Sonnets.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2002/january9/shakespeare-a.html
Stanford Report, January 9, 2002.
http://www.fact-index.com/s/sh/shakespearean_authorship.html
A pro-Stratfordian position.
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/flashbks/shakes/matus.htm
Stratfordian article by Irvin Matus, from Atlantic Monthly, Oct. 1991.
http://shakespeareauthorship.com/michell.html
A pro-Stratfordian essay.
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/hidncode.htm
Presents common arguments for and against Shakespeare's authorship, concluding that Shakespeare wrote the plays.
http://www.theuniversityconcourse.com/article/1847.html
by Robert Englert.
Home > Arts > Literature > World Literature > British > Shakespeare > Authorship > Stratfordians
Thanks to DMOZ, which built a great web directory for nearly two decades and freely shared it with the web. About us