Home > Society > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity > Bible > References and Tools > Textual Studies > King James Version Only Debate
Should the King James Version of the Bible be regarded as authoritative to the exclusion of other English translations? Are all Bible versions equally the word of God?
http://www.chick.com/reading/books/157/157cont.asp
Online book traces the history of the Authorized Version and compares it to modern translations. Written by Samuel C. Gipp; published by Chick Publications.
http://brandplucked.webs.com/
Articles by Will Kinney supporting the KJV.
http://av1611godsword.yuku.com/
Message board for King James advocates.
http://av1611.com/kjbp/
Advocates inerrancy of the King James Version, argues that modern versions and the Critical Text have serious corruptions. Articles, verse comparisons, and FAQs.
http://www.learnthebible.org/Bible%20Issues.htm
From Learn the King James Bible. Articles addressing various aspects of the KJV debate from a pro-KJV position.
http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/
Forum for discussing pro- and con- KJV positions.
http://www.biblebelievers.com/
Extensive resources promoting the perfection and authority of the KJV. Also includes material relating to other doctrines.
http://www.chick.com/information/bibleversions/
FAQs and articles and tracts promoting the KJV.
http://av1611.org/
Many articles and online tracts promoting the KJV and arguing against the use of modern versions.
http://sh1.webring.com/people/dm/mad9/
Argues that the King James Version is the inerrant word of God, from a Mid-Acts dispensational position.
http://www.blessedquietness.com/journal/balaam.htm
Many articles and annotated links promoting the KJV.
http://www.kjv-asia.com/
Articles, resources, and topical studies defending and teaching from the King James Version.
http://www.avpublications.com/3_catalogue/nabv/nabv_html_tract.htm
Verse comparison excerpts from the book New Age Bible Versions.
http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=803
Henry Morris' essay defending the KJV and advocating its use.
http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/vol06/Robinson2001.html
Defends the Byzantine Text, while distancing it from the Textus Receptus, as more reliable than modern, eclectic critical editions of the New Testament.
http://bibles.n7nz.org/marsh/lectur28.html
Lecture given in 1859, published in 1863, by a prominent professor on the linguistic suitability of the authorized version of 1611. Recommends against updating it and opposes English re-translation.
http://vintage.aomin.org/kjvo.html
Includes several articles and dialogues. This website is by the author James White.
http://www.kjvonly.org/
Argues "King James Onlyism" is a "falsehood."
http://www.thywordistruthkjv.com/
Articles on the Bible version issue and other topics.
http://www.wayoflife.org/database/textsversionsheader.html
A number of articles defending the KJV by David Cloud.
http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/kjv2.htm
Argues problems with the "King James Version Only" view.
http://bible.org/article/why-i-do-not-think-king-james-bible-best-translation-available-today/
Article by Daniel B. Wallace, detailing problems with the Greek text from which the King James Version was translated.
Home > Society > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity > Bible > References and Tools > Textual Studies > King James Version Only Debate
Thanks to DMOZ, which built a great web directory for nearly two decades and freely shared it with the web. About us